|
Important Notice:
Although XO Wave will continue to be available for some time,
it will be discontinued as we prepare to bring you the next generation
Digital Audio Workstation.
The new software we are developing is called
Xonami and it will have
many, but not all, of the features of XO Wave.
A discount upgrade path will be available
for users who purchased XO Wave September 1st, 2010.
We realize that
there are few professional CD mastering options with the full range of capabilities offered
by XO Wave, so we will continue to offer the package as long as possible. However,
please keep in mind that as discontinued software:
- This site may not contain up-to-date information.
- Technical Support will be discontinued on November 30th.
For up-to-date information about our upcoming software, please join our
mailing list.
XO Wave: EQ Distortion
No EQ is perfect. This page attempts to explain why. If you would
like to know more, digital signal processing texts cover these
issues in greater depth.
People generally talk about EQ, (or equalization, which is sometimes called
"filtering") in terms of adding or reducing the amount of sound
at certain frequencies. This is the "frequency domain" perspective of
EQ. There is another important perspective to consider regarding
EQ, though: the "time domain". Designers of filters (especially
digital filters) often spend a great deal of time thinking about
the time domain, but it's sometimes important to non-engineers
as well. For one thing, a filter can have great frequency
response but still produce undesirable results because of
effects in the time domain. These problems can be hard to
describe, but people tend to say they hear problems with "stereo
image", "clarity", or "naturalness" of the resulting audio.
Technically, time domain issues are generally caused by problems with
"non-linear phase shift." Without going into mathematical
detail, phase shift is an artifact of virtually all EQ (both analog and digital), and
can be a serious problem in some contexts. But because phase
shift is so common and so difficult to avoid, audio engineers
tend to regard it as a necessary evil. Digital filters can be
designed to avoid phase shift, but such filters tend to be
hundreds or even thousands of times more computationally
intensive. Unless carefully designed, these "linear phase"
filters can have problems of their own, including pre-echoes,
"jumpy" frequency response, extreme latency, and parameters that
are impossible to automate.
Time domain aside, all filters have some problems in the frequency
domain as well. Some filters have uneven or "rippled" frequency
response, others allow too much signal through the stop band,
and still others eliminate desired signals in the pass band. In
fact, it is mathematically impossible to design a filter with
perfect frequency selectivity, which usually makes filter design
and selection a case of picking the best approximation to the
filter you really want.
Obviously, picking a filter can be tricky business, and there are a
wide variety of filters which offer various trade-off in both
frequency and time domain response. Probably the most popular filters
used in audio are Butterworth filters. They offer a smooth
transition between pass band and stop band, have no ripple, and
are computationally efficient. On the other hand, Butterworth
filters have a fairly strong phase shift, which may not be
desired.
|